Case Evaluation

Construction Defect Litigation: A Few Legal Theories Concerning Construction Defects

A Few Legal Theories Concerning Construction Defects

The typical construction defect case is based on the contracts between the homeowner and developer and the contracts between the contractor and subcontractors, including suppliers, architects and engineers, involved in building the home. The goal of the Construction Accident attorney is to require the party who is responsible for the defect to remedy the situation. The complaint against the defendants typically alleges negligence, breach of contract or warranty, strict liability, and in some instances fraud or negligent misrepresentation may be alleged.

Negligence

The law imposes the obligation upon the developer/general contractor/ subcontractor to exercise the reasonable degree of care, skill and knowledge that is ordinarily employed by such building professionals. The duty of care is extended to all who may foreseeably sencounter a Construction Accident as a result of the defect, including subsequent purchasers. Developers and general contractors are responsible for the negligence of their subcontractor.

Breach of Contract

Homeowners can sue the builder/developer, under theories based upon privity of contract, for breach of any obligation set forth in the purchase and sale documentation, and/or the escrow instructions. Typically, this is something that goes beyond a failure of the builder to build the project in accordance with the plans and specifications.

When such claims are made, courts often invoke the doctrine of substantial performance, which typically requires the builder to pay the contract price with the deduction for the reduced market value of the home/unit caused by the failure of the builder to strictly comply with the plans and specifications.

Breach of Warranty

Similar to breach of contract theories, the purchase documentation between the developer and the homeowner often sets forth warranties regarding the condition of the property. If there is an issue as to breach of an express warranty, the principles of contract apply.

Courts have held that builders and sellers of new construction should be held to what is implied, that the completed structure was designed and constructed in a reasonable workmanlike manner. A builder/vendor is subject to the theory that a home was built for sale to the public to be used for a specific purpose. Privity of contract is not always required under this particular theory of liability.
In some states, homebuyers may waive or builders may disclaim implied warranties. If disclaimers are involved in construction accidents, they are strictly construed against the seller/developer. Typically, waivers are difficult to enforce.

Strict Liability Claims

In most jurisdictions, the implied warranty of habitability imposes strict liability on the general contractor. The theory of strict liability against a general contractor evolved from products liability law. In a strict liability case the plaintiff does not have to prove the general contractor or developer was negligent in the construction of the home. They do have to prove the defendant was involved in the mass production of housing, a defect in the house exists, damages were proximately caused by the defect, and the defendant caused or created the defect.

Fraud and Negligent Misrepresentation

Fraud is alleged on the grounds that the developer intentionally misrepresented the quality of construction in false statements or advertisements. It must be shown the developer had not intention of following the design plans and specifications as promised.

Negligent misrepresentation is based on proving the developer asserted something as factual, but had not reasonable basis for believing the information to be true.

Limits on Potential Claims

Most states impose time limits on construction defect claims by Statutes of repose and Statutes of limitations. Statutes of repose specify the time period within which a cause of action can arise at all. Under these statutes, the limitation period may expire before the plaintiff's cause of action has arisen.

Conversely, statutes of limitation foreclose suits after a fixed period of time following occurrence or discovery of an injury. These statues are complex and vary from state to state. It is critical that you seek the advice of an experienced attorney if you believe the damages to your home are the result of a construction defect before you lose your right to seek a remedy from the responsible parties.

In most states the time limits begin to run when the defect is discovered, or should have been discovered by a reasonable person. If the defect is patent, or apparent based on reasonable inspection, the action against a defendant must begin within the time period specified by state law. If the defect is latent, or not readily apparent by reasonable inspection, any action to recover damages generally must be within ten years after improvements are substantially completed.

Conclusion

Construction defect litigation is complex for the Construction Accident lawyers and for the parties involved. It may involve several defendants, include insurance companies and involve many legal theories. Most states impose complex time limits on when a claim may be brought. If you believe your home suffers from a defect caused by the builder, or another party, protect your rights. Talk to construction accidents attorneys with experience in this complex area of law.
 

Construction Accident Case Evaluation

* First Name:
* Last Name:
* Zipcode:
* E-Mail:
* Phone:
Okay to call you at this number?
Yes No
Enter any relevant background information or case specifics so that we can best understand your situation:
To Prevent Automated Submissions, Enter the 4 Digit Number Shown Below
(OR YOU MAY CALL US DIRECTLY AT 888-375-7600)
9918

Construction Accident Topics

Construction Accident Videos

Construction Accident Links

Personal Injury Resources